Case study:Gadebridge park river restoration
Invertebrates,Yes,Yes,No,Yes,Yes,Awaiting results
Connection to groundwaters,Yes,Yes,No,No,Yes,Awaiting results
Freshwater flow regime,Yes,Yes,No,No,Yes,Improvement
*Factor in a good contingency for the project, thinking about the contractors available on the framework, increases in material costs, inflation, FTE charges, compensation events. Have a good understanding of any changes to the design, working with the designer to estimate cost increases. *The project group should contain members of the required level of authority. Set accountabilities early to avoid delays and misunderstanding plus each team's minimum requirements. Technical team leads should have ownership of their elements of the project to ensure all discussion items are logged and addressed. *Make sure all staff have the training and capabilities to conduct their role within the project team and they have available resource. *Develop a robust benefits realisation strategy early on to enable a better understanding of the benefits to all parties and a greater financial contribution. *Walk the line of works with the Topography Plan and Tree Survey before commencing works at site, to check for mapping discrepancies. *Ensure a close working relationship with the designer and the technical teams to avoid delays. *Engage with the local community in a variety of ways eg. project web page, mailing list updates, project mailbox, Facebook, Twitter, council newsletters, onsite signage, community events.
1:3 and 1:6 banks, Introduction of spawning gravels, Creation of pools and riffles, creation of buffer zones, Creation of low flow channel, gravel river access point, preservation of historic mill leat,Creation of multi stage channel, Improving fish migration, Lowland meadow, Maintenance of riparian vegetation, Introduction of spring flow, New ultrasonic gauging station,Improvement of channel morphology, Improving fish migration, restoring more sinuous planform Introduction of 2 foot bridges,,Engagement with a wide range of stakeholders, 2 events in the park, Junior river wardens programme, school visits, tours and presentations for local interest groups, social media video, Information boards, mailing list, project website, project mailbox, community satisfaction survey,Ecological survey, Monitoring via Fixed Point Photography, Climate change adaptation, Definition of environmental objectives and indicators and monitoring program., Removal of Stevenson Stones for display
Baseline surveys undertaken for the project site pre-works: *Macrophytes- dominated by marginal reeds and herbs, which choked much of the channel and the number of scoring taxa is very low. First record of water crowfoot at this site in 2024, but at cover value of 2 (1%). First record of lesser water-parsnip present at this site in 2024, but at cover value 1 (0.1%). INNS (Orange balsam) was recorded here in past surveys (2016 - 2023) at low cover, but not recorded in 2024. Suspected issues at this site could be turbidity, siltation/slow flow and poaching as the site is located in the park and popular for building temporary dams and children splashing in a summer. There were a limited number of Macrophytes species and a very homogenous community in the mill channel. *Hyporheic zone- There were no specialist groundwater/hyporheic fauna recorded in any of the samples. *Water quality- the water quality was both stable and at a high level across the two sites. There was little evidence of any pollution inputs impacting this stretch of the Gade and the low turbidity levels also show that there was minimal siltation / sedimentation issues. *River fly- Improvements are possible with restoration, aiming to increase abundances of caseless caddisflies, mayflies, and stoneflies. *Invertebrates- Scored as Good status in 2017 and High status in 2018, 19, 21, 22 & 23. *Fish- in the 2021 survey we were suffering low flows. The highly modified old channel had no resilience in such conditions and offered very little habitat for fish during those flows. We confirmed this, as we recorded trout on a survey in 2022 further upstream, where restoration work had been carried out previously. We have completed two water vole surveys a year since 2021 as they have been recorded both upstream and downstream of the park. We utilised camera traps and rafts from November 2023 and through 2024 and removed scrub/saplings to prevent the area from becoming overgrown and limiting water vole foraging opportunities. There had been no sightings of water vole for two years prior to construction. Post construction surveys: Macrophyte survey- August 2025: New species: *Persicaria maculosa (Redshank) *Callitriche obtusangula (Blunt fruited water starwort) *Sparganium erectum (Branched bur-reed) *Lemna minor (Duckweed) *The total number of species has increased from 18 to 24 new ones Increase in cover: *Ranunculus penicillatus subsp. Pseudofluitans (Brook watercrowfoot) *Veronica anagallis-aquatica (Water speedwell) Fisheries: In a fisheries survey in September 2025, we recorded high numbers of minnow, and similar counts for stickleback and bullhead. Most significantly we recorded 14 trout in the ~100m section, with a few different age classes represented. We also undertook a detailed habitat survey to help assess how the habitat will change in the coming years. Summary of improvement- Our work within the park restored a more varied range of habitats that could be used across more flows. Our 2025 post works survey showed a significant increase in numbers of "minor" species, all of which are prey items for trout. Their increased abundance is a great sign of river health and will support trout numbers in the park. Habitat requirements change as trout are in different life stages. The trout we recorded were from a few different age classes, from juveniles to adults. This shows that even in a 100m section there is enough variety in habitat to support a population of trout. BNG has increased by 10% from 26.8 units to 29.53 units A Kingfisher and 3 Grey Wagtail have also been spotted on site since the restoration was completed. Surveys are ongoing, including water vole, riverfly, hyporheic, flow, temperature, macrophytes, invertebrates and fish.
River Habitat Survey,Yes,Yes,No,Yes,Yes,Awaiting results
Water vole survey,Yes,Yes,No,Yes,No,Awaiting results
Public opinion,Yes,Yes,Yes,No,No,Awaiting results
river bank vegetation,Yes,Yes,Yes,No,Yes,Awaiting results
Oxygen balance,Yes,Yes,No,Yes,No,Awaiting results
Temperature,Yes,Yes,No,Yes,No,Awaiting results
Drone footage of new channel and central footbridge.
The River Gade, a globally rare chalk stream with poor ecological status within Gadebridge park, used to flow down a ‘perched’ channel created to supply water to Bury Mill. It was disconnected from its floodplain and over widened, leading to sluggish flows and a build-up of silt and vegetation. The EA Gauging Station Bury Mill and other in-channel structures acted as barriers to fish movement. Being disconnected from groundwater and spring flow had a significant impact on low flow resilience and to wildlife. Partnered with Dacorum Borough Council and Affinity Water Limited, this Environment Agency lead project realigned 415 metres of river channel to the valley bottom through the park. This re-routing of the river reconnected it to the natural floodplain and chalk aquifer. The newly excavated channel features gently sloping river banks, creating a wide and shallow river in keeping with natural chalk stream form. Gravels were added to restore the lost river bed, and shaped to restore in-channel features such as riffles and side bars. The Bury Mill gauging station was replaced with an ultrasonic one to allow fish passage. Work progressed from 2018 with construction complete in June 2025. With the inclusion of spring water flow, which was previously piped beneath the park and discharged at Kings Langley 5 Kilometres downstream, 6.5 kilometres of river has been improved. 0.85 hectares of habitat was created, 3.9 hectares habitat enhanced, 0.9 hectares buffer strip created and 1.1km water body opened to fish passage. The river corridor now provides better resilience to low and high flows and the impacts of climate change. Two new bridges and a large gravel access point to the channel were provided for the local community. The project was designed by JBA Consulting Limited and delivered by BAM Nuttall Limited.
Gade (Upper stretch Great Gaddesden to confluence with Bulbourne / GUC)
gade (upper stretch great gaddesden to confluence with bulbourne / guc)
Engagement with a wide range of stakeholders
tours and presentations for local interest groups
American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus)
Total project cost: £4.148 million. EA FCERM £2.268 million, EA Water Resources £1.510 million. Affinity Water £250k. Dacorum Borough Council £120k. Five Rivers were subcontracted by BAM to undertake the ecological elements of the works- placement of gravels, planting etc.
Definition of environmental objectives and indicators and monitoring program.
!Gadebridge park river restoration Gade (Upper stretch Great Gaddesden to confluence with Bulbourne / GUC)
Gadebridge park river restoration# QUERYef055d862cd0513b69dfa1726e0a6a29