Case study:Wylrebeek
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
| Status | Complete |
|---|---|
| Project web site | |
| Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Spatial planning |
| Country | Netherlands |
| Main contact forename | Arnoud |
| Main contact surname | Soetens |
| Main contact user ID | |
| Contact organisation | Waterschap Limburg |
| Contact organisation web site | http://waterschaplimburg.nl |
| Partner organisations | |
| Parent multi-site project | |
| This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This stream had to be rerouted because of the construction of highway A73. It was constructed in a wide sandy strip. The sand was kept in place with wooden boards until vegetation was sufficiently developed to keep the sediment fixated. A weir has been removed to promote higher flow velocities. A fish passage used to cause excessive sedimentation, which has been fixed by creating a preferential flowpath.
Monitoring surveys and results
The boards kept the sediment in its desired place. Once a sufficient vegetation cover was established, the stream could flow freely without regulation or undesirable erosion. In the current landscape, the stream is more prominent.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
|
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
