]> 2026-04-20T04:50:55+00:00 Case study:Upper River Nairn restoration project 500 en Aberarder channel evolution.pdf Aberarder redd distributions 2017 and 2018.pdf Aberarder wetland enhancement.pdf Aberarder study site & restoration overview.pdf Aberarder redd counts.mp4 Aberarder channel evolution Location of salmonid redds surveyed in 2017 and 2018 spawning seasons Aberarder wetland enhancement Aberarder study & restoration overview Location of salmonid redds Approved Channel realignment embankment removal channel reprofiling installation of large wood structures Changing from a canalised straightened channel to a meandering/ wondering channel Aberarder Estate Scottish Water Environment Fund (WEF) No No Yes AberarderNewLowerChannel.jpg AberarderUpperWetland.jpg Aberarderpostconstruction2.jpg Aberarder - New Lower Channel Aberarder - Upper Wetland Aberarder - Large Wood structure Hamish Moir cbec eco-engineering UK Ltd cbec eco-engineering UK Ltd Salix - McGowan Aberarder Estate The work has resulted in rapid evolution of the site to a condition of improved physical heterogeneity (in-channel and wetland areas), with associated ecological responses. This has also resulted in a general aesthetic improvement, from a very simple canalised, embanked and perched channel to one that is much more physically variable, natural-looking and connected with standing water features (i.e. wetlands). The planting of trees in the riparian zone also benefits the site in this regard. A practical benefit of the works was the improved protection of key areas of farming land from local flood risk. This was achieved through the removal of embankments on river right, permitting greater floodplain connectivity (with associated physical/ ecological benefits) to the east/ south of the channel while reducing pressure on the opposite bank. Furthermore, the implemented works greatly improved agricultural drainage; the bed of the restored channel was over 1 m lower than the previously perched condition, meaning that field drains could flow freely where they had previously been backed-up. Although not a primary objective of the project, considering these design objectives was essential to achieving buy-in by the local farmer. There are also more general Natural Flood Management (NFM) benefits of the project. With greater floodplain/ wetland connectivity, there is greater inundation of areas adjacent to the channel under certain flood magnitudes. The storage of water in such areas will provide an increased level of protection to downstream areas. Furthermore, the re-establishment of native woodland will also contribute to NFM, adding roughness to the floodplain (slowing flows and increasing water storage times) and increasing the interception of water (surface flow and rainfall) through slowing flows and water absorption. Through such processes, the works will provide greater resilience to the effects of climate change. This is also the case for drought conditions; the previously homogenous condition of the channel has been replaced with a much more diverse morphology (particularly considering the wetland areas) that provides far greater potential for biotic refugia. The work has generally improved the understanding of the benefits of such projects and the appropriate methods of their delivery. This has been a key case study for this type of work for SEPA and, with monitoring ongoing, dissemination of information will provide an invaluable resource to the wider river restoration community. Given the explicit development of an integrated steering group and the associated project management approach, challenges during the project were minimised. Also, experience from previous construction projects by the design/ build team meant that many potential issues were avoided. There was careful planning of the construction phase of the project such that the most intrusive works (i.e. construction of the realigned channel and large wood implementation) were conducted ‘offline’, minimising the risk of high flow events impacting the works and fine sediment pollution. Such ‘assisted recovery’ designs explicitly require a degree of ‘field fitting’, allowing for unexpected issues encountered to be managed through appropriate short notice design variations. This was the case in the furthest downstream section of the site where, due to wet ground, it was not safe for construction machinery to excavate the initially proposed realigned channel in this area. It was therefore decided that the proposed design be modified such that the third (furthest downstream) wetland feature would be instated through this ~200 m long section, subsequently proving to be an appropriate revision. Such a short notice adjustment was only possible due to the close and established working relationship between the designer, regulator (i.e. SEPA) and contractor. 57.300235543466,-4.2813942961524 Aberarder Euan Aberarder Estate Anderson Riparian tree planting fencing Channel realignment, embankment removal, channel reprofiling, installation of large wood structures,Channel realignment, channel reprofiling, reinstatement of three wetlands,Changing from a canalised straightened channel to a meandering/ wondering channel ,Riparian tree planting, fencing,, Hamish Moir cbec eco-engineering UK Ltd Post works monitoring is essential for evaluating the physical and ecological performance of the project. Given the near unique scale of application of the ‘process-based’ restoration approach, the project provided an invaluable opportunity to monitor how the river environment responds to the various components of the implemented works, providing valuable insight and guidance for the application of this type of approach in other areas. Specific monitoring has included: • Repeat topographic/ bathymetric surveys (immediately post-construction and subsequent to three high flow events flood events). • Repeat sediment sampling (pre- and post- implementation) • Repeat fixed-point photographs • Repeat spawning surveys/ redd counts (including pre-works and the two spawning seasons post-construction) • Repeat electro-fishing surveys (in both channel and wetland locations, pre- and post-works) Immediately after construction, a detailed topographic and sedimentary resurvey were carried out. Further resurveys have been undertaken after significant flow events, determining rapid evolution of the site and in the trajectory intended (and predicted by modelling). Given fish populations are a good indicator of habitat condition, repeat red counts and electro-fishing surveys have also been undertaken. Latest survey results show significant increases in spawning and juvenile salmon and trout compared to pre-restoration conditions, providing an ‘ecological validation’ the works implemented. Hamish Euan Moir Anderson 23968 Euan Anderson Aberarder Estate 2018-04-01Z 2458209.5 2014-11-20Z 2456981.5 Complete The site is located on the upper River Nairn, just west of the settlement of Croachy. The study section is 4 km long, extending upstream to where the channel exits from its steep headwater zone. The gradient of the channel generally decreases as it transitions into a floodplain zone, currently managed for agriculture. Under natural conditions, the study site was a highly dynamic alluvial fan with multiple channels. However, because of historical engineering for land management, natural physical processes in this part of the upper Nairn were significantly altered. The channel had been straightened and constrained between embankments, becoming ‘perched’ above its floodplain due to aggradation of its bed. The river corridor lacked the physical features and associated habitats that would naturally occur, mainly through the lack of morphological variability but also limited tree cover and large wood material in the active channel. As a result, the water body was classified at poor ecological status under EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) classifications. Following a ‘process-based’ approach, an ‘assisted recovery’ design strategy was adopted, permitting the river to self-adjust towards a quasi-stable ‘dynamic equilibrium’ morphological condition. The aim was to reinstate a greater potential for the development of lateral channel variability (through the evolution of alluvial bar forms and associated bank erosion processes) and connectivity with wetland/ floodplain environments. Initially a series of conceptual design were developed from which, after stakeholder engagement, a preferred option was identified. A detailed design phase then followed, supported by high-resolution 2D hydrodynamic and morphodynamic (i.e. sediment transport) modelling. An iterative modelling-design process determined the optimal restoration approach for the different river sections. Three different design strategies were proposed in discrete sections of the site. Due to practical site constraints, the design in the upstream sections of the site could only involve the localised reprofiling of the river corridor (mainly the removal/ re-grading of existing embankments) while, in the downstream section, channel realignment and the reinstatement of ‘online’ wetlands were implemented. Almost 1 km of channel length was realigned into a more sinuous course through a lower elevation area. Importantly, this connected a series of three online wetland areas before tying back into the existing channel course downstream. Furthermore, to mitigate the lack of large wood (LW) processes through the site, riparian planting was conducted in conjunction with the installation of ‘bar apex’ LW structures at appropriate locations through the realigned channel. Whilst the primary objectives of the restoration project were to address the issues of excess sediment accumulation (and associated channel ‘perching’), flooding/ land drainage and reduced habitat quality, improving the WFD classification status of the River Nairn was also a key objective of the Project. Currently, the waterbody (River Farnack confluence to source in the River Nairn catchment, Waterbody 20306) has been classified by SEPA as being at poor status, primarily as a result of morphological and hydrogeomorpholocial pressures on the waterbody resulting from modifications to the bed and banks of the river. Through the River Basin Management Planning Strategy, SEPA has identified and prioritised water bodies where improvements are required to enable good ecological status to be met. As part of the second cycle of the River Basin Management Planning Process, SEPA has identified the River Nairn as a priority catchment and as part of a national strategic plan, the URNRP will help national objectives to be met. Upper River Nairn restoration project upper river nairn restoration project 2400 Channel realignment channel reprofiling reinstatement of three wetlands Environmental flows and water resources Fisheries Flood risk management Habitat and biodiversity Hydromorphology Land use management - agriculture Land use management - forestry Monitoring Salix - McGowan 2017-09-30Z 2458026.5 2017-08-01Z 2457966.5 2019-02-15T11:35:20Z 2458529.9828704 2019-03-25T10:39:14Z 2458567.943912 Upper River Nairn restoration project