]> 2026-04-22T07:50:26+00:00 Case study:Beekherstel Buurserbeek 500 en Approved 0.8 0.5 - 2 m 0.00074 Less than 0.001 6 5 - 10 m Vergraven van de oever Yes Yes No Improvement No Fish,Yes,Yes,No,No,No,Improvement Invertebrates,Yes,Yes,No,No,No,Improvement Fish Invertebrates No Waterschap Rijn en Ijssel STOWA Central Plains Yes No Yes true Yes Yes No Improvement No Substrate conditions,Yes,Yes,No,No,No,Improvement Flow velocities,Yes,Yes,No,No,No,Improvement Width & depth variation,Yes,Yes,No,No,No,Improvement Substrate conditions Flow velocities Width & depth variation No No 52.13619007799,6.7094856886408 John Waterschap Rijn en Ijssel Lenssen 1.41 1 - 10 m³/s Vergraven van de oever,Dood hout inbreng,, ,,, The results of dead wood introduction are not yet known. It is clear, though, that they cannot function as cascades. The combined effect of the two measures described above is a greater structure variation and a faster base flow. Yes Yes No Improvement No Concentration phosphate, Chloride and Nitrogen,Yes,Yes,No,No,No,Improvement No Concentration phosphate, Chloride and Nitrogen 24291 STOWA, Yes Yes No Improvement No Temperature,Yes,Yes,No,No,No,Improvement PH,Yes,Yes,No,No,No,Improvement Oxygen balance,Yes,Yes,No,No,No,Improvement Nutrient concentrations,Yes,Yes,No,No,No,Improvement Temperature PH Oxygen balance Nutrient concentrations No Buurserbeek Buurserbeek.jpg 2015 2457023.5 Complete The Buurserbeek is now a slow-flowing, strongly normalized stream. It is partially located in an agricultural area, but most of the stream flows through woods are natural areas (e.g. Buurserzand and the woods east of Haaksbergen) and/or has woody vegetation on its banks. A 4 meter wide maintenance path runs parallel to most of the stream and the entire stream runs between embankments or high grounds. Upstream of the Twenteroute, the stream carries water most of the year and in most places, the flow velocity is sufficient to support flow-loving fish. Downstream of the Twenteroute, the discharge mostly stops in summer, causing the stream to become stagnant. There is intensive maintenance in the reaches downstream of Braambrug. The Buurserbeek does not yet meet its ecological targets. The stream is too deep and has insufficient variation in structure. Nutrient levels remain to high in the Buurserbeek as well. This is mostly caused by upstream pollution in Germany. The stream can meander freely within its embankments. The stream is shallow and wide and features both sand bars and stream pits, as well as dead wood and a local lush aquatic vegetation. Most of the stream corridor (80%) is wooded. The Buurserbeek is completely accessible to fish. Water authority Rijn en IJssel introduced tree stems into the stream to replace the stone cascades that used to be there. In another stretch of the stream, a maintenance path was removed to make the stream wider and shallower. Beekherstel Buurserbeek beekherstel buurserbeek No Rijndelta Rijn Dood hout inbreng Schipbeek schipbeek Buurserbeek buurserbeek 100 - 1000 km² 23 Less than 100 m Schipbeek NL07_0028 Environmental flows and water resources Flood risk management Habitat and biodiversity Monitoring R5 NL07_0029 2015-12-31Z 2457387.5 2019-06-30T09:54:00Z 2458664.9125 2021-03-31T14:28:37Z 2459305.103206 Beekherstel Buurserbeek 500 1 plainlist 5 [[Category:Case study]] [[Project title::!Beekherstel Buurserbeek]] [[Subcatchment title::Schipbeek]] Beekherstel Buurserbeek# QUERY39f03de979f2c68a101395dc12533caa 500 [2,"smw_unitnotallowed","*10^-4"] Beekherstel Buurserbeek# ERR3d7e743d9cb8b262f3c782d963b6c48a Case study:Beekherstel Buuserbeek 500 en Beekherstel Buuserbeek REDI 102 en REDI