Case study:Restoring the River Doquette to its original bed
Project overview
| Status | Complete |
|---|---|
| Project web site | |
| Themes | |
| Country | France |
| Main contact forename | Fabien |
| Main contact surname | Goulmy |
| Main contact user ID | |
| Contact organisation | Fédération de la Manche pour la pêche et la protection du milieu aquatique |
| Contact organisation web site | |
| Partner organisations | |
| Parent multi-site project | |
| This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Doquette is a small salmonid river, tributary of the River Sienne. The river is home to brown trout and bullhead; it is also likely to be colonised by Atlantic salmon.
In the 1970s, a part of the Doquette was moved into a straight channel at the edge of a field. The original bed was retained and transformed into a drainage ditch. The river, now in a “raised” position, deteriorated. The flow patterns became uniform and the habitats of the low water channel became homogenised. Since being moved, the Doquette flowed over the bedrock and could dry out during the low-flow period.
In application of the multi-annual restoration and maintenance programme for the catchment area of the River Sienne, there were plans to erect fencing along the raised river. The landowner, who had two channels on his plot, requested modifications in order to avoid the erection of fencing along both the raised river and the drained river. This double intervention would indeed have posed certain problems relating to the use of this land. The local institute in collaboration with the departmental fishing federation, thus proposed to restore the Doquette to its former bed, which would then be the only section to be fenced.
The original river bed was wider (mean width of 4.5 metres). 136 tonnes of aggregates were brought in from a quarry and deposited in the river. 77 tonnes of stones and pebbles (from 0 to 250 mm), were used to form the armour layer, with the remaining 59 tonnes being used to reconstitute the alluvial mattress. A connection was made with the river, while the existing connection with the straightened bed was blocked. The old, spring-fed channel was not filled in. Both banks of the restored river were fenced and a ford crossing and drinking trough were installed.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
| River basin district | Seine-Normandie |
|---|---|
| River basin | sienne |
Subcatchment
| River name | Doquette |
|---|---|
| Area category | |
| Area (km2) | |
| Maximum altitude category | |
| Maximum altitude (m) | |
| Dominant geology | |
| Ecoregion | Western Plains |
| Dominant land cover | agriculture, forest |
| Waterbody ID |
Site
| Name | Percy |
|---|---|
| WFD water body codes | I70490000 |
| WFD (national) typology | |
| WFD water body name | |
| Pre-project morphology | Straight |
| Reference morphology | Single channel, Sinuous |
| Desired post project morphology | |
| Heavily modified water body | true |
| National/international site designation | |
| Local/regional site designations | |
| Protected species present | |
| Invasive species present | |
| Species of interest | |
| Dominant hydrology | Quick run-off, Groundwater |
| Dominant substrate | Gravel |
| River corridor land use | Intensive agriculture |
| Average bankfull channel width category | 2 - 5 m |
| Average bankfull channel width (m) | 2.22.2 m <br />0.0022 km <br />220 cm <br /> |
| Average bankfull channel depth category | |
| Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
| Mean discharge category | |
| Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | 0.050.05 m³/s <br />50 l/s <br /> |
| Average channel gradient category | |
| Average channel gradient | 0.0011 |
| Average unit stream power (W/m2) | 0.2451750.245 W/m² <br /> |
Project background
| Reach length directly affected (m) | 240 m0.24 km <br />24,000 cm <br /> |
|---|---|
| Project started | |
| Works started | 2008/10/01 |
| Works completed | 2008/10/01 |
| Project completed | |
| Total cost category | Less than 10 k€"Less than 10 k€" is not in the list (Less than 1 k€, 1 - 10 k€, 10 - 50 k€, 50 - 100 k€, 100 - 500 k€, 500 - 1000 k€, 1000 - 5000 k€, 5000 - 10000 k€, more than 10000 k€) of allowed values for the "Total cost category" property. |
| Total cost (k€) | 9 k€9,000 € <br /> |
| Benefit to cost ratio | |
| Funding sources | Water Agency, Regional Council, Fédération de la Manche pour la pêche et la protection du milieu aquatique |
Cost for project phases
| Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigation and design | |||||
| Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
| Works and works supervision | 1 - 10 k€ | 9 k€9,000 € <br /> | Fédération de la Manche pour la pêche et la protection du milieu aquatique | ||
| Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
| Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
| Mitigation of a pressure | |
|---|---|
| Hydromorphology | Structure & condition of riparian zones |
| Biology | |
| Physico-chemical | |
| Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
|---|---|
| Bank/bed modifications | Introducing sediment |
| Floodplain / River corridor | |
| Planform / Channel pattern | Re-instatement of old course, Re-instatement of sinuosity |
| Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
| Management interventions | Promoting riparian vegetation |
| Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
| Other | |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
| Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Biological quality elements
| Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Physico-chemical quality elements
| Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
| Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
| Link | Description |
|---|
