Case study:Yew Tree Farm

From RESTORE
Revision as of 12:47, 26 February 2026 by Alan Graham (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Humber
River basin Tame Anker and Mease

Subcatchment

River name River Mease from Gilwiskaw Bk to Hooborough Brook
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2) 170km217,000 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 185185 m <br />0.185 km <br />18,500 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Cotom in the Elms, Edingale, Gilly Mease Confluence, Grange Farm, Restoring the River Mease Catchment



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Ruth
Main contact surname Needham
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Trent Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.trentriverstrust.org
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Restoring the River Mease Catchment

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


650m of main River Mease restoration including 1.3ha riparian habitat improvement. Gravel introduction, bank reprofiling, backwater creation, floodplain scrape and swale creation to add diversity of flows and wetland habitat.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Fixed point photography. Drone footage.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


The project was paused due to concerns from residents in Netherseal. At that time (2020) only gravel introduction was delivered. In 2023, the rest of the capital works were delivered. We engaged with the local Councillor to facilitate community engagement, and due to community interest, we held an evening engagement walk in June 2024 to see the river restoration works, which was well attended by the community and 2 farmers. This led to the creation of the Netherseal community volunteer group, working on Himalayan Balsam bashing in Nether Wood.

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 42' 44.71" N, 1° 34' 22.15" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information