Case study:Gadebridge park river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
|---|---|
| Bank/bed modifications | 1:3 and 1:6 banks, Introduction of spawning gravels, Creation of pools and riffles, creation of buffer zones, Creation of low flow channel, gravel river access point, preservation of historic mill leat |
| Floodplain / River corridor | Creation of multi stage channel, Improving fish migration, Lowland meadow, Maintenance of riparian vegetation, Introduction of spring flow, New ultrasonic gauging station |
| Planform / Channel pattern | Creation of meanders, Improvement of channel morphology, Improving fish migration |
| Other | Introduction of 2 foot bridges |
Non-structural measures
| |
| Management interventions | |
| Social measures (incl. engagement) | Engagement with a wide range of stakeholders, 2 events in the park, Junior river wardens programme, school visits, tours and presentations for local interest groups, social media video, Information boards, mailing list, project website, project mailbox, community satisfaction survey |
| Other | Ecological survey, Monitoring via Fixed Point Photography, Climate change adaptation, Definition of environmental objectives and indicators and monitoring program., Removal of Stevenson Stones for display |
Reasons for river restoration
Site
| Name | Gadebridge Park |
|---|---|
| WFD water body codes | GB106039029900 |
| WFD (national) typology | freshwater, Chalk stream |
| WFD water body name | Gade (Upper stretch Great Gaddesden to confluence with Bulbourne / GUC) |
| Pre-project morphology | Impounded, Over deepened, Over-widened, Single channel, Straightened |
| Reference morphology | |
| Desired post project morphology | Actively meandering, Pool-riffle |
| Heavily modified water body | No |
| National/international site designation | |
| Local/regional site designations | |
| Protected species present | Yes |
| Invasive species present | Yes |
| Species of interest | Orange Balsam, American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus), Water Vole |
| Dominant hydrology | Groundwater |
| Dominant substrate | Silt |
| River corridor land use | Urban, parkland, farmland |
| Average bankfull channel width category | |
| Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
| Average bankfull channel depth category | |
| Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
| Mean discharge category | |
| Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
| Average channel gradient category | |
| Average channel gradient | |
| Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
| Reach length directly affected (m) | 415415 m <br />0.415 km <br />41,500 cm <br /> |
|---|---|
| Project started | 2015-10-07 |
| Works started | 2024-09-04 |
| Works completed | 2025-07-01 |
| Project completed | 2026-07-22 |
| Total cost category | more than 10000 k€ |
| Total cost (k€) | |
| Benefit to cost ratio | |
| Funding sources | Environment Agency, AffinityWater, Dacorum Borough Council |
Cost for project phases
| Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigation and design | more than 10000 k€ | JBA Consulting | Oliver | Francis | |
| Stakeholder engagement and communication | Environment Agency | Kelly | Standbrook | ||
| Works and works supervision | BAM Nuttall Limited | David | Bugden | ||
| Post-project management and maintenance | Dacorum Borough Council | Robert | Cassidy | ||
| Monitoring | Environment Agency | Kelly | Standbrook |
Supplementary funding information
Total project cost: £4.148 million. EA FCERM £2.268 million, EA Water Resources £1.510 million. Affinity Water £250k. Dacorum Borough Council £120k.
Project overview
| Status | Complete |
|---|---|
| Project web site | http://https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/engagement/gadebridge-park-information-page/ |
| Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Social benefits, Urban |
| Country | England |
| Main contact forename | Kelly |
| Main contact surname | Standbrook |
| Main contact user ID | |
| Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
| Contact organisation web site | http://https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
| Partner organisations | Affinity Water, Dacorum Borough Council |
| Parent multi-site project | |
| This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The River Gade, a globally rare chalk stream with poor ecological status within Gadebridge park, used to flow down a ‘perched’ channel created to supply water to Bury Mill. It was disconnected from its floodplain and over widened, leading to sluggish flows and a build-up of silt and vegetation. The EA Gauging Station Bury Mill and other in-channel structures acted as barriers to fish movement. Being disconnected from groundwater and spring flow had a significant impact on low flow resilience and to wildlife. Partnered with Dacorum Borough Council and Affinity Water Limited, this Environment Agency lead project diverted 415 metres of river channel to the valley bottom through the park. The Bury Mill gauging station was replaced with an ultrasonic one to allow fish passage. Work progressed from 2018 with construction complete in June 2025.
0.85 hectares of habitat was created, 3.9 hectares habitat enhanced, 6.5 km of river restored, 0.9 hectares buffer strip created and 1.1km water body opened to fish passage. The river corridor now provides better resilience to low and high flows and the impacts of climate change. Two new bridges and a large gravel access point to the channel were provided for the local community.
The project was designed by JBA Consulting Limited and delivered by BAM Nuttall Limited.
Monitoring surveys and results
Macrophyte survey- August 2025:
New species:
- Persicaria maculosa (Redshank)
- Callitriche obtusangula (Blunt fruited water starwort)
- Sparganium erectum (Branched bur-reed)
- Lemna minor (Duckweed)
- The total number of species has increased from 18 to 24 new ones
Increase in cover:
- Ranunculus penicillatus subsp. Pseudofluitans (Brook watercrowfoot)
- Veronica anagallis-aquatica (Water speedwell)
Fisheries: In a fisheries survey in September 2025, we recorded high numbers of minnow, and similar counts for stickleback and bullhead. Most significantly we recorded 14 trout in the ~100m section, with a few different age classes represented. We also undertook a detailed habitat survey to help assess how the habitat will change in the coming years.
Summary of improvement- In the 2021 survey we were suffering low flows. The highly modified old channel had no resilience in such conditions and offered very little habitat for fish during those flows. We confirmed this, as we recorded trout on a survey in 2022 further upstream, where restoration work had been carried out previously. Our work within the park restored a more varied range of habitats that could be used across more flows.
Our 2025 post works survey showed a significant increase in numbers of "minor" species, all of which are prey items for trout. Their increased abundance is a great sign of river health and will support trout numbers in the park. Habitat requirements change as trout are in different life stages. The trout we recorded were from a few different age classes, from juveniles to adults. This shows that even in a 100m section there is enough variety in habitat to support a population of trout.
BNG has increased by 10% from 26.8 units to 29.53 units
A Kingfisher and 3 Grey Wagtail have also been spotted on site since the restoration was completed.
Lessons learnt
- Factor in a good contingency for the project, thinking about the contractors available on the framework, increases in material costs, inflation, FTE charges, compensation events. Have a good understanding of any changes to the design, working with the designer to estimate cost increases.
- The project group should contain members of the required level of authority. Set accountabilities early to avoid delays and misunderstanding plus each team's minimum requirements. Technical team leads should have ownership of their elements of the project to ensure all discussion items are logged and addressed.
- Make sure all staff have the training and capabilities to conduct their role within the project team and they have available resource.
- Develop a robust benefits realisation strategy early on to enable a better understanding of the benefits to all parties and a greater financial contribution.
- Walk the line of works with the Topography Plan and Tree Survey before commencing works at site, to check for mapping discrepancies.
- Ensure a close working relationship with the designer and the technical teams to avoid delays.
- Engage with the local community in a variety of ways eg. project web page, mailing list updates, project mailbox, Facebook, Twitter, council newsletters, onsite signage, community events.
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
| River basin district | Thames |
|---|---|
| River basin | Colne |
Subcatchment
| River name | Gade (Upper stretch Great Gaddesden to confluence with Bulbourne / GUC) |
|---|---|
| Area category | 10 - 100 km² |
| Area (km2) | |
| Maximum altitude category | 200 - 500 m |
| Maximum altitude (m) | 253253 m <br />0.253 km <br />25,300 cm <br /> |
| Dominant geology | Calcareous |
| Ecoregion | Great Britain |
| Dominant land cover | Grassland |
| Waterbody ID | GB106039029900 |
Image gallery
.png)
.png)
.png)
|
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and referencesSupplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||