Case study:Oude Diep
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
| Status | Complete |
|---|---|
| Project web site | |
| Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Water quality |
| Country | Netherlands |
| Main contact forename | Sander |
| Main contact surname | Verheijen |
| Main contact user ID | |
| Contact organisation | Waterschap Drents Overijsselse Delta |
| Contact organisation web site | http://www.wdodelta.nl |
| Partner organisations | |
| Parent multi-site project | |
| This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Water Authority Drents Overijsselse Delta tried to increase the flow velocity in this stream to improve aquatic ecology and meet WFD criteria. Weed-cutting was limited to the main channel and the stream was divided into a blue and a green zone. The blue zone was regularly maintained to ensure flow continuity, while the green zone was maintained less often.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
|
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beentjesgraven, Beneden Regge, De Doorbraak, Deurningerbeek, Dinkel Noord, Jufferbeek, Living Vechte-Dinkel, Marswetering, Midden Regge, Oude Bornschebeek... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
