Case study:Gilly Mease Confluence: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=52.69056, -1.5009 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Gilly Mease Confluence |Status=Complete |Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality |Country=England |Main contact forename=Ruth |Main contact surname=Needham |Contact organisation=Trent Rivers Trust |Contact organisation url=www.trentriverstrust.org |Multi-site=No |N...")
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study subcatchment
|Approval status=Draft
|Subcatchment=Gilwiskaw Brook from Source to River Mease
}}
{{Location
|Location=52.69056, -1.5009
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Gilly Mease Confluence
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality
Line 14: Line 10:
|Contact organisation=Trent Rivers Trust
|Contact organisation=Trent Rivers Trust
|Contact organisation url=www.trentriverstrust.org
|Contact organisation url=www.trentriverstrust.org
|Partner organisations=AECOM
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoring the River Mease Catchment
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoring the River Mease Catchment
|Project summary=The main aim was to capture and store phosphorous within reconnected floodplain areas to reduce nutrient levels.
1.7ha floodplain bounded by Gilwiskaw Brook, River Mease and a disused railway embankment.
The channels were inset, deep and had poor floodplain connectivity.
There was historic embankment and possible dredging and large fluctuations in orthophosphate levels.
Wetland creation - lowered ground level by 0.5m, excavated anastomosing channels and ponds. Introduced gravel and created a bridge crossing to reinstate permission access.
2.5ha of terrestrial habitat improvements, 0.3km main river stretch.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Fixed point photography.
Monitored vegetation regeneration and channel movements.
Measham volunteer group are familiar with this site and undertake maintenance.
|Project title=Gilly Mease Confluence
}}
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
}}
{{Location
|Location=52.69056, -1.5009
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
 
{{Site}}
{{Site}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background}}

Latest revision as of 12:47, 26 February 2026

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Humber
River basin Tame Anker and Mease

Subcatchment

River name River Mease from Gilwiskaw Bk to Hooborough Brook
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2) 170km217,000 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 185185 m <br />0.185 km <br />18,500 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Cotom in the Elms, Edingale, Grange Farm, Restoring the River Mease Catchment, Yew Tree Farm



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Ruth
Main contact surname Needham
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Trent Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.trentriverstrust.org
Partner organisations AECOM
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Restoring the River Mease Catchment

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The main aim was to capture and store phosphorous within reconnected floodplain areas to reduce nutrient levels. 1.7ha floodplain bounded by Gilwiskaw Brook, River Mease and a disused railway embankment. The channels were inset, deep and had poor floodplain connectivity. There was historic embankment and possible dredging and large fluctuations in orthophosphate levels. Wetland creation - lowered ground level by 0.5m, excavated anastomosing channels and ponds. Introduced gravel and created a bridge crossing to reinstate permission access. 2.5ha of terrestrial habitat improvements, 0.3km main river stretch.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Fixed point photography. Monitored vegetation regeneration and channel movements. Measham volunteer group are familiar with this site and undertake maintenance.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 41' 26.02" N, 1° 30' 3.24" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information