Case study:River Ecclesbourne Restoration Project

Location: 53° 0' 54.00" N, 1° 32' 33.90" W

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E River Ecclesbourne Restoration Project\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=England\" title=\"England\"\u003EEngland\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Water quality\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"River Ecclesbourne Restoration Project","link":"","lat":53.015,"lon":-1.54275,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Measures

Edit Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications	Barrier removal, Creation of fish pass, Erosion Repair, Introducing sediment
Floodplain / River corridor	Floodplain reconnection
Planform / Channel pattern	Channel realignment, Creation of new channel
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions	Removal of invasive species, Riparian tree planting, Livestock exclusion
Social measures (incl. engagement)	Environmental education activities with local schools, Community Education, Interpretation boards, interacting with farmers
Other

Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology	Continuity for organisms
Biology	Fish
Physico-chemical	Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project

Project background

Edit project background

Reach length directly affected (m)	1600016,000 m <br />16 km <br />1,600,000 cm <br />
Project started	2018-12-06
Works started	2022-08-01
Works completed	2024-07-01
Project completed	2025-03-31
Total cost category	1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources	Government Grant in Aid, Private Company, Charitable Funds

Cost for project phases

Phase	cost category	cost exact (k€)	Lead organisation	Contact forename	Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring

Site

Edit site

Name	River Ecclesbourne
WFD water body codes	GB104028052720
WFD (national) typology	River
WFD water body name	Ecclesbourne Catchment
Pre-project morphology	Impounded, Straightened, Over deepened
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology	Actively meandering, Pool-riffle, Run-glide
Heavily modified water body	No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present	Yes
Invasive species present	Yes
Species of interest	Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Brown trout (Salmo trutta), grayling (Thymallus thymallus), Brook lamprey
Dominant hydrology	Quick run-off
Dominant substrate	Gravel
River corridor land use	Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment

Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district	Humber
River basin	Derbyshire Derwent

Subcatchment

River name	River Ecclesborne catchment (trib of R Derwent)
Area category	10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category	200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m)	355355 m <br />0.355 km <br />35,500 cm <br />
Dominant geology	Siliceous
Ecoregion	Great Britain
Dominant land cover	Improved grassland
Waterbody ID	GB104028052720

Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ecclesbourne Farm project

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site
Themes	Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Urban, Water quality
Country	England
Main contact forename	Jennifer
Main contact surname	Kril
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation	Derbyshire Wildlife Trust
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations	Wild Trout Trust, Environment Agency, Nestle Waters & Premium Beverages, Chatsworth Estate
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

The River Ecclesbourne Restoration Project (Derbyshire, England) is a six‑plus year, partnership‑led programme to restore river health and reconnect migratory fish to upstream habitat. It targeted two major barriers: Snake Lane Weir (2.5 m) and Postern Mill Weir (2 m), delivering a phased approach, removal and rock‑ramp installation at Snake Lane (Phase 1, winter 2022) and a 400 m re-meander and paleochannel reconnection at Postern Mill (Phase 2, winter 2023 – spring 2024). The work was driven by long‑term evidence showing severe fragmentation (20+ years of Environment Agency surveys) and by the return of migratory salmon to the Derwent after earlier catchment improvements. Interventions emphasised working with natural processes: regrading channels, creating riffle–pool sequences, restoring sediment continuity, and reconnecting floodplain and paleochannel to allow dynamic morphological adjustment. Delivery combined technical design, regulatory oversight and blended funding from partners including Derbyshire Wildlife Trust (lead for Postern Mill), Wild Trout Trust (lead for Snake Lane), the Environment Agency, Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages and Chatsworth Estate. Community engagement, volunteer habitat work and education were integral throughout. The project cost exceeded £1.1 million (Snake Lane ~£500k; Postern Mill ~£460k) and completed physical works in 2025, with complimentary wider catchment restoration (Invasive species control, tree planting and biodiversity enhancements, with monitoring funded through 2029. The scheme sits within a coordinated catchment strategy (Derbyshire Derwent Catchment Partnership, Humber River Basin Management Plan and Derbyshire Derwent Fish Passage Project) and contributes to wider ambitions to reopen the Derwent and Trent catchments to migratory fish. “The River Ecclesbourne Restoration Project is the result of more than six years of dedicated partnership work to improve river health and restore fish passage across the catchment."

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.

Monitoring is multimethod and repeatable, designed to measure habitat change, species response and connectivity. Core elements are: annual electrofishing at six historic EA sites to track species composition, abundance, biomass and age structure; eDNA sampling for early detection of low‑density or cryptic species; redd counts each autumn/winter to map salmon spawning distribution; fixed‑point photography and drone surveys to document geomorphic evolution; trail cameras to record wildlife use; and UKHab assessments to classify habitat condition. Additional techniques included non‑EA electric fishing surveys, repeat visits to assess rust‑fungus biocontrol trials for invasive plants, and hydraulic/flow modelling used both in design and post‑event evaluation. These complementary methods provide quantitative and qualitative lines of evidence for adaptive management and are repeated on a defined schedule to allow before/after and upstream/downstream comparisons.

Results: The project reopened previously inaccessible habitat and produced clear biological responses: salmon recolonised upstream reaches within months of Snake Lane works (a spawned‑out hen found 1 km upstream), and by 2025 an Atlantic salmon parr plus several newly recorded coarse fish species were documented at Postern Mill, confirming reconnection. Electrofishing and eDNA confirm return and movement of species including Atlantic salmon, chub, grayling and gudgeon. Morphological monitoring shows active sediment transport, evolving riffles, pools and meanders; trail cameras and public reporting demonstrate increased wildlife use and strong community interest. The scheme gained national/international attention (Dam Removal Europe finalist; Natural History Museum case study).

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.

- Work with natural processes rather than over‑engineering: re-meandering and floodplain reconnection produced rapid geomorphic recovery and self‑sustaining habitat complexity. - Robust evidence and modelling matter, especially under extreme weather: detailed hydraulic modelling supported design decisions and proved accurate during Storm Babet, informing emergency responses and building public confidence. - Partnerships and blended funding accelerate delivery and broaden ownership; engaging landowners and tenant farmers early secured permissions and stewardship. - Community engagement and transparent communication (GIS storyboards, QR codes, videos, field visits) are essential for social licence and long‑term stewardship.

Overall, the Ecclesbourne project demonstrates that targeted, evidence‑led barrier removal and channel reconnection can rapidly restore connectivity and biodiversity while delivering multiple social and climate‑resilience benefits.

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

Monitoring Hydromorphological quality elements Edit Hydromorphological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Biological quality elements Edit biological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Physico-chemical quality elements Edit Physico-chemical quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic Edit Other responses Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Monitoring documents Upload monitoring documents Additional documents and videos Upload additional documents Additional links and references Edit links and references Link Description Supplementary Information Edit Supplementary Information