Case study:Ty Mawr: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Draft
Line 7: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Ty Mawr
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Line 14: Line 12:
|Main contact surname=Robins
|Main contact surname=Robins
|Main contact id=JoshRRC
|Main contact id=JoshRRC
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Four Rivers for LIFE
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Four Rivers for LIFE
|Project picture=Examples-of-large-wood-in-river-tarell.png
|Project summary=The scheme focussed on a stretch of the River Tarell, an important tributary of the River Usk SAC (Special Area of Conservation), and aimed to restore the river’s natural processes by re-introducing wood into the river channel. 
 
Led by the Natural Resources Wales (NRW) Four Rivers for LIFE project and the River Restoration Centre (RRC) – the scheme is part of a wider nature restoration project by the National Trust at their site. Much of the upper part of the River Tarell catchment flows through land under National Trust ownership at their Ty Mawr Farm site in the Brecon Beacons.
 
The work saw 40 trees winched into a 600 metre stretch of the river channel to create 14 large wood structures. These were strategically positioned to encourage floodplain reconnection and improve habitat, whilst maintaining access for migratory fish.
 
The trees were wedged into the riverbank to minimise the risk of them becoming displaced during high flows. Ash dieback had affected a significant number of trees in the area, so these were the first trees to be used in the scheme.
|Project title=Ty Mawr
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
Line 21: Line 28:
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
 
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Afon Tarell - source to conf R Usk
}}
{{Site}}
{{Site}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background}}

Latest revision as of 14:50, 4 July 2025

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 53' 41.86" N, 3° 29' 16.37" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country Wales
Main contact forename Josh
Main contact surname Robins
Main contact user ID User:JoshRRC
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Four Rivers for LIFE

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The scheme focussed on a stretch of the River Tarell, an important tributary of the River Usk SAC (Special Area of Conservation), and aimed to restore the river’s natural processes by re-introducing wood into the river channel.

Led by the Natural Resources Wales (NRW) Four Rivers for LIFE project and the River Restoration Centre (RRC) – the scheme is part of a wider nature restoration project by the National Trust at their site. Much of the upper part of the River Tarell catchment flows through land under National Trust ownership at their Ty Mawr Farm site in the Brecon Beacons.

The work saw 40 trees winched into a 600 metre stretch of the river channel to create 14 large wood structures. These were strategically positioned to encourage floodplain reconnection and improve habitat, whilst maintaining access for migratory fish.

The trees were wedged into the riverbank to minimise the risk of them becoming displaced during high flows. Ash dieback had affected a significant number of trees in the area, so these were the first trees to be used in the scheme.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Severn
River basin Usk

Subcatchment

River name Afon Tarell - source to conf R Usk
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 500 - 1000 m
Maximum altitude (m) 856856 m <br />0.856 km <br />85,600 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Improved grassland
Waterbody ID GB109056033070



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information