Case study:Oude Vaart: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) m (Bas Wullems moved page Case study:Oude Vaart, Wold Aa, Oude Diep to Case study:Oude Vaart: Information divided over separate pages (one page per stream)) |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Vecht (Overijssel) | |||
}} | |||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name=Oude Vaart | |Name=Oude Vaart | ||
|WFD water body code=NL35_Oude Vaart | |WFD water body code=NL35_Oude Vaart | ||
|WFD (national) typology=R5, | |WFD (national) typology=R5, | ||
|WFD water body name=Oude Vaart | |WFD water body name=Oude Vaart | ||
|Pre-project morphology= | |Pre-project morphology=Straightened, | ||
|Reference morphology= | |Reference morphology=Actively meandering, | ||
|Desired post project morphology= | |Desired post project morphology=Straightened, | ||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |Heavily modified water body=Yes | ||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No | ||
Latest revision as of 13:10, 26 January 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
| Status | Complete |
|---|---|
| Project web site | |
| Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Water quality |
| Country | Netherlands |
| Main contact forename | Sander |
| Main contact surname | Verheijen |
| Main contact user ID | |
| Contact organisation | Waterschap Drents Overijsselse Delta |
| Contact organisation web site | http://www.wdodelta.nl |
| Partner organisations | |
| Parent multi-site project | |
| This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Water Authority Drents Overijsselse Delta tried to increase the flow velocity in this stream to improve aquatic ecology and meet WFD criteria. Weed-cutting was limited to the main channel and the stream was divided into a blue and a green zone. The blue zone was regularly maintained to ensure flow continuity, while the green zone was maintained less often.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
|
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beentjesgraven, Beneden Regge, De Doorbraak, Deurningerbeek, Dinkel Noord, Jufferbeek, Living Vechte-Dinkel, Marswetering, Midden Regge, Oude Bornschebeek... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
