Case study:Chester Weir Notch: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=53.18641, -2.88694 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Chester Weir Notch |Status=Complete |Themes=Fisheries |Country=Wales |Main contact forename=Josh |Main contact surname=Robins |Main contact id=JoshRRC |Contact organisation=Natural Resources Wales |Multi-site=No |Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:LIFE Dee River }} {{Image gallery}} {{Image gallery end}} {{Toggle button}} {{Toggle content s...")
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Chester Weir Notch
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Fisheries
|Themes=Fisheries
Line 14: Line 13:
|Main contact id=JoshRRC
|Main contact id=JoshRRC
|Contact organisation=Natural Resources Wales
|Contact organisation=Natural Resources Wales
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:LIFE Dee River
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:LIFE Dee River
|Project picture=Chester-weir.jpg
|Project summary=In partnership with the Environment Agency, the aim of the work was to improve downstream passage for young salmon and sea trout as part of the multi-million-pound LIFE Dee River project, led by Natural Resources Wales (NRW).
Located at the tidal limit of the Dee, Chester weir is 150 metres in length and 3 metres high. An existing canoe and fish gate was in place in the weir crest that had not functioned for over 20 years.
Prior to the work, young fish were often delayed on their downstream journey by the weir, particularly at low flows in the spring when there was not enough water to help them pass over the structure.
Unable to swim over such a large man-made barrier, fish would congregate above the weir and were more vulnerable to predation from birds and larger fish.
Work to dismantle the existing gate and surrounding structure was carried out during low tides by experienced local contractors, using a pontoon to transport materials across the river.
A new, specially fabricated stainless-steel gate was installed which is operated by a winch on the bank, allowing it to be opened and closed easily at key periods throughout the year.
 
|Project title=Chester Weir Notch
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Dee - Chester Weir to Ceiriog
}}
{{Site}}
{{Site}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background}}

Latest revision as of 12:17, 4 July 2025

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 11' 11.08" N, 2° 53' 12.98" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries
Country Wales
Main contact forename Josh
Main contact surname Robins
Main contact user ID User:JoshRRC
Contact organisation Natural Resources Wales
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:LIFE Dee River

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


In partnership with the Environment Agency, the aim of the work was to improve downstream passage for young salmon and sea trout as part of the multi-million-pound LIFE Dee River project, led by Natural Resources Wales (NRW). Located at the tidal limit of the Dee, Chester weir is 150 metres in length and 3 metres high. An existing canoe and fish gate was in place in the weir crest that had not functioned for over 20 years. Prior to the work, young fish were often delayed on their downstream journey by the weir, particularly at low flows in the spring when there was not enough water to help them pass over the structure. Unable to swim over such a large man-made barrier, fish would congregate above the weir and were more vulnerable to predation from birds and larger fish. Work to dismantle the existing gate and surrounding structure was carried out during low tides by experienced local contractors, using a pontoon to transport materials across the river. A new, specially fabricated stainless-steel gate was installed which is operated by a winch on the bank, allowing it to be opened and closed easily at key periods throughout the year.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.



Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Dee
River basin Middle Dee

Subcatchment

River name Dee - Chester Weir to Ceiriog
Area category 1000 - 10000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 136136 m <br />0.136 km <br />13,600 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Improved grassland
Waterbody ID GB111067057080



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Erbistock Weir Removal, LIFE Dee River, QUERCUS Dee, River Dee


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information