Case study:Kensworth Quarry Chalk Pit Site Restoration: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Location | |||
|Location=51.86565, -0.52097 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Planned | |Status=Planned | ||
| Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
|Approval status=Draft | |Approval status=Draft | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:10, 8 May 2025
Project overview
| Status | Planned |
|---|---|
| Project web site | |
| Themes | |
| Country | England |
| Main contact forename | Adam |
| Main contact surname | Hillier |
| Main contact user ID | |
| Contact organisation | Ver Valley Society |
| Contact organisation web site | |
| Partner organisations | |
| Parent multi-site project | |
| This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Kensworth Quarry is the Us largest chalk quarry and one of the largest in the world. It is located on the top of the Chilterns ridge close to the head valleys of the River Ver.
Production from the quarry is due to end within the next decade after which the site will be subject to a site restoration program.
It is proposed to evaluate the technical and commercial feasibility of using the chalk pit as a perched reservoir to provide a wetland natural habitat of national significance, to provide pumped hydro energy storage for local renewable energy generation plants, and to provide head water support to the River Ver for up to three months per year.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Site
| Name | |
|---|---|
| WFD water body codes | |
| WFD (national) typology | Calcareous |
| WFD water body name | |
| Pre-project morphology | |
| Reference morphology | |
| Desired post project morphology | |
| Heavily modified water body | No |
| National/international site designation | |
| Local/regional site designations | |
| Protected species present | No |
| Invasive species present | No |
| Species of interest | |
| Dominant hydrology | |
| Dominant substrate | |
| River corridor land use | |
| Average bankfull channel width category | |
| Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
| Average bankfull channel depth category | |
| Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
| Mean discharge category | |
| Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
| Average channel gradient category | |
| Average channel gradient | |
| Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Image gallery
|
Catchment and subcatchment
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
