Case study:Wandsworth Riverside Quarter - Revision history

Ascarr at 13:43, 16 September 2024

2024-09-16T13:43:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 16 September 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Case study status~~
	~~\|Approval status=Approved~~
	}}
	~~{{Location~~
	~~\|Location=51.46273746270802, -0.1957261562347412~~
	}}
	{{Project overview		{{Project overview
	\|Status=Complete		\|Status=Complete
	\|Project web site url=www.restorerivers.eu/Portals/27/Wandsworth%20Riverside%20Quarter%20Intertidal%20Terraces.pdf		\|Project web site url=www.restorerivers.eu/Portals/27/Wandsworth%20Riverside%20Quarter%20Intertidal%20Terraces.pdf
	\|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Spatial planning, Urban		\|Themes=Estuary, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Spatial planning, Urban
	\|Country=England		\|Country=England
	\|Main contact forename=Toni		\|Main contact forename=Toni
Line 14:		Line 8:
	\|Main contact id=Ascarr		\|Main contact id=Ascarr
	\|Contact organisation=Environment Agency		\|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
	\|Partner organisations=Fraser Property, J.T Mackley & Co Ltd; Salix Wetlands~~, Beckett Rankine, Capita Lovejoy, Biodiversity By Design~~		\|Partner organisations=Beckett Rankine, Biodiversity By Design, Capita Lovejoy, Fraser Property, J.T Mackley & Co Ltd; Salix Wetlands
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
	\|Project picture=Wandsworth Riverside.jpg		\|Project picture=Wandsworth Riverside.jpg
Line 58:		Line 52:
	* The site links in within green roofs and other green infrastructure designed as part of the redevelopment master plan creating an extended green network.		* The site links in within green roofs and other green infrastructure designed as part of the redevelopment master plan creating an extended green network.
	* The site acts as a showcase to demonstrate what can be achieved on tidal rivers.		* The site acts as a showcase to demonstrate what can be achieved on tidal rivers.
	\|Lessons learn=• Proactive discussion between the Environment Agency and the developers led to beneficial outcomes for both parties, and the creation of a multifunctional, more natural riverside environment.		\|Lessons learn=* Proactive discussion between the Environment Agency and the developers led to beneficial outcomes for both parties, and the creation of a multifunctional, more natural riverside environment.
	• Use of coir rolls to stabilise the sediment accretion and bank reprofiling was insufficient and required rock roll installation.		* Use of coir rolls to stabilise the sediment accretion and bank reprofiling was insufficient and required rock roll installation.
	• Success of sediment accretion between the terraces demonstrates good geomorphological understanding of processes and modelling.		* Success of sediment accretion between the terraces demonstrates good geomorphological understanding of processes and modelling.
	}}		}}
			{{Case study status
			\|Approval status=Approved
			}}
			{{Location
			\|Location=51.46273746270802, -0.1957261562347412
			}}

	{{Image gallery}}		{{Image gallery}}
	{{Case study image		{{Case study image

Alexrrc at 14:51, 8 November 2018

2018-11-08T14:51:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 8 November 2018
Line 50:		Line 50:
	* Restore aquatic habitats in modified watercourses		* Restore aquatic habitats in modified watercourses
	* Use green engineering techniques instead of hard bank protection		* Use green engineering techniques instead of hard bank protection
			<br>
			<br>
			https://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/51_wandsworth.pdf
	\|Monitoring surveys and results=* Creation of a range of intertidal habitats in an otherwise biodiversity-poor area of the constrained Rivers Wandle and Thames.		\|Monitoring surveys and results=* Creation of a range of intertidal habitats in an otherwise biodiversity-poor area of the constrained Rivers Wandle and Thames.
	* Improved access to the River Thames and River Wandle, bringing residents and members of the public closer the watercourse.		* Improved access to the River Thames and River Wandle, bringing residents and members of the public closer the watercourse.

Hazel Wilson at 09:12, 27 October 2015

2015-10-27T09:12:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 27 October 2015
Line 80:		Line 80:
	{{Site		{{Site
	\|Name=Bow Creek confluence with the Thames		\|Name=Bow Creek confluence with the Thames
	\|WFD (national) typology=Intertidal,		\|WFD water body code=GB530603911402
			\|WFD (national) typology=Intertidal,
	\|WFD water body name=THAMES MIDDLE		\|WFD water body name=THAMES MIDDLE
	\|Heavily modified water body=Yes		\|Heavily modified water body=Yes
Line 86:		Line 87:
	\|Invasive species present=No		\|Invasive species present=No
	\|Species=smelt		\|Species=smelt
	\|Dominant hydrology=Tidal,		\|Dominant hydrology=Tidal,
	\|Dominant substrate=Gravel,		\|Dominant substrate=Gravel,
	\|River corridor land use=Urban,		\|River corridor land use=Urban,
	}}		}}
	{{Project background		{{Project background

NickRRC at 14:58, 4 December 2013

2013-12-04T14:58:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:58, 4 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Case study status		{{Case study status
	\|Approval status=~~Draft~~		\|Approval status=Approved
	}}		}}
	{{Location		{{Location

Ascarr at 15:00, 23 October 2013

2013-10-23T15:00:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 23 October 2013
Line 116:		Line 116:
	{{Monitoring documents end}}		{{Monitoring documents end}}
	{{Additional Documents}}		{{Additional Documents}}
			{{Case study documents
			\|File name=Wandsworth Riverside Quarter Intertidal Terraces.pdf
			\|Description=Case Study
			}}
	{{Case study documents		{{Case study documents
	\|File name=4458 Intertidal Terraces Diary WORK IN PROGRESS Aug 2009.pdf		\|File name=4458 Intertidal Terraces Diary WORK IN PROGRESS Aug 2009.pdf

Ascarr at 14:59, 23 October 2013

2013-10-23T14:59:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 23 October 2013
Line 100:		Line 100:

	}}		}}
	{{Motivations}}		{{Motivations
			\|Specific mitigation=Flood and coastal erosion protection,
			\|Hydromorphological quality elements=Structure & condition of intertidal zone,
			}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures}}
	{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}		{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}

Ascarr at 14:57, 23 October 2013

2013-10-23T14:57:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 23 October 2013
Line 90:		Line 90:
	\|River corridor land use=Urban,		\|River corridor land use=Urban,
	}}		}}
	{{Project background}}		{{Project background
			\|Reach length directly affected=30
			\|Project started=2009/01/01
			\|Project completed=2009/12/31
			\|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€
			\|Funding sources=Frasers Property
			\|Works1 and supervision cost category=50 - 100 k€
			\|Supplementary funding information=the whole scheme including the development cost between £100k-£500k

			}}
	{{Motivations}}		{{Motivations}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures}}

Ascarr at 14:54, 23 October 2013

2013-10-23T14:54:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 23 October 2013
Line 78:		Line 78:
	\|Subcatchment=THAMES MIDDLE		\|Subcatchment=THAMES MIDDLE
	}}		}}
	{{Site}}		{{Site
			\|Name=Bow Creek confluence with the Thames
			\|WFD (national) typology=Intertidal,
			\|WFD water body name=THAMES MIDDLE
			\|Heavily modified water body=Yes
			\|Protected species present=No
			\|Invasive species present=No
			\|Species=smelt
			\|Dominant hydrology=Tidal,
			\|Dominant substrate=Gravel,
			\|River corridor land use=Urban,
			}}
	{{Project background}}		{{Project background}}
	{{Motivations}}		{{Motivations}}

Ascarr at 14:52, 23 October 2013

2013-10-23T14:52:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 23 October 2013
Line 75:		Line 75:
	{{Toggle button}}		{{Toggle button}}
	{{Toggle content start}}		{{Toggle content start}}
	{{Case study subcatchment}}		{{Case study subcatchment
			\|Subcatchment=THAMES MIDDLE
			}}
	{{Site}}		{{Site}}
	{{Project background}}		{{Project background}}

Ascarr at 14:50, 23 October 2013

2013-10-23T14:50:55Z

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 }}
 {{Image gallery}}
 {{Image gallery end}}
 {{Toggle button}}