Case study:Stony Stratford Sluices Bypass Channel - Revision history

Alexrrc at 13:46, 1 November 2018

2018-11-01T13:46:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 1 November 2018
Line 65:		Line 65:
	\|Project completed=2016/03/31		\|Project completed=2016/03/31
	\|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€		\|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€
	\|Funding sources=~~WFD GiA,~~ FCRM GiA, Milton Keynes Parks Trust		\|Funding sources=FCRM GiA, Milton Keynes Parks Trust, Environment Agency Grant in Aid,
	\|Investigation and design cost category=1 - 10 k€		\|Investigation and design cost category=1 - 10 k€
	\|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Fishtek Consulting		\|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Fishtek Consulting

2018-07-10T15:01:02Z

2018-07-10T15:00:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 10 July 2018
Line 88:		Line 88:
	\|Biological quality elements=Fish,		\|Biological quality elements=Fish,
	}}		}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures
			\|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of fish passes,
			\|Social measures=Partnerships,
			}}
	{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}		{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
	{{End table}}		{{End table}}

2016-04-20T14:30:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 20 April 2016
Line 44:		Line 44:
	{{Site		{{Site
	\|Name=Stony Stratford		\|Name=Stony Stratford
	\|WFD water body code=GB105033037920,		\|WFD water body code=GB105033037920,
	\|WFD water body name=Ouse (Buckingham to Cosgrove)		\|WFD water body name=Ouse (Buckingham to Cosgrove)
	\|Pre-project morphology=~~Well defined paleo channel. sinuous. Uniform bed roughness.~~		\|Pre-project morphology=Sinuous,
	\|Desired post project morphology=Sinuous ~~with variable bed features~~		\|Desired post project morphology=Sinuous,
	\|Heavily modified water body=Yes		\|Heavily modified water body=Yes
	\|Protected species present=No		\|Protected species present=No
	\|Invasive species present=Yes		\|Invasive species present=Yes
	\|Dominant substrate=Clay		\|Dominant substrate=Clay
	\|River corridor land use=Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture,		\|River corridor land use=Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture,
	\|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m		\|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m
	\|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m		\|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m

2016-04-20T14:29:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 20 April 2016
Line 84:		Line 84:
	}}		}}
	{{Motivations		{{Motivations
	\|Specific mitigation=Impoundments (not hydropower),		\|Specific mitigation=Impoundments (not hydropower),
	\|Hydromorphological quality elements=~~longitudinal connectivity,~~ substrate conditions		\|Hydromorphological quality elements=substrate conditions, Continuity for organisms, Quantity & dynamics of flow,
	\|Biological quality elements=Fish,		\|Biological quality elements=Fish,
	}}		}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures}}

2016-04-20T14:26:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 20 April 2016
Line 83:		Line 83:
	\|Monitoring Other contact surname=Clapham		\|Monitoring Other contact surname=Clapham
	}}		}}
	{{Motivations}}		{{Motivations
			\|Specific mitigation=Impoundments (not hydropower),
			\|Hydromorphological quality elements=longitudinal connectivity, substrate conditions
			\|Biological quality elements=Fish,
			}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures}}
	{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}		{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}

2016-04-20T14:23:41Z

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 |Average channel gradient category=more than 0.1
 }}
-{{Project background}}
+{{Project background
 {{Motivations}}
 {{Measures}}

2016-04-20T14:19:28Z

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 {{Toggle content start}}
 {{Case study subcatchment}}
-{{Site}}
+{{Site
 {{Project background}}
 {{Motivations}}

2016-04-20T14:11:40Z

2016-04-20T14:11:02Z

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 }}
 {{Image gallery}}
 {{Image gallery end}}
 {{Toggle button}}