Case study:Restoration of Ilabekken brook - Revision history

Kasvio at 11:16, 26 September 2013

2013-09-26T11:16:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 26 September 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Case study status		{{Case study status
	\|Approval status=~~Draft~~		\|Approval status=Approved
	}}		}}
	{{Location		{{Location

Kasvio at 11:16, 26 September 2013

2013-09-26T11:16:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 26 September 2013
Line 16:		Line 16:
	\|Partner organisations=Municipality of Trondheim and The Norwegian Public Roads Administration		\|Partner organisations=Municipality of Trondheim and The Norwegian Public Roads Administration
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
	\|Project picture=~~Illabekken morten2012, Hanskemakergata~~.~~gif~~		\|Project picture=Illabecken2012.JPG
	\|Picture description=Ilabekken after restoration 2012 (photo by Morten Bergan)		\|Picture description=Ilabekken after restoration 2012 (photo by Morten Bergan)
	\|Project summary=The Ilabekken brook is a small watercourse in the City of Trondheim. Since the early 20th century the area of the brook has urbanized. Because of the urbanization and loading from the sewage waters there has been loss of habitats and natural biodiversity in the brook. The sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) population had disappeared, in addition to other aquatic organisms and birds.		\|Project summary=The Ilabekken brook is a small watercourse in the City of Trondheim. Since the early 20th century the area of the brook has urbanized. Because of the urbanization and loading from the sewage waters there has been loss of habitats and natural biodiversity in the brook. The sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) population had disappeared, in addition to other aquatic organisms and birds.

Kasvio at 11:16, 26 September 2013

2013-09-26T11:16:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 26 September 2013
Line 29:		Line 29:
	{{Image gallery}}		{{Image gallery}}
	{{Case study image		{{Case study image
	\|File name=~~Ilabekken 1896, Hanskemakergata~~.~~gif~~		\|File name=Illabecken1896.JPG
	\|Caption=Ilabekken year 1896 (photo from Morten Bergan)		\|Caption=Ilabekken year 1896 (photo from Morten Bergan)
	}}		}}
	{{Case study image		{{Case study image
	\|File name=~~Ilabekken 1956, Hanskemakergata~~.~~gif~~		\|File name=Illabecken1956.JPG
	\|Caption=Ilabekken year 1956 (photo from Morten Bergan)		\|Caption=Ilabekken year 1956 (photo from Morten Bergan)
	}}		}}

SFW Mehul at 10:19, 6 September 2013

2013-09-06T10:19:47Z

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 The restoration of Ilabekken brook has been a good example of good co-operation between different stakeholders. There were open and broad channels of communication with the local population and other actors throughout the planning process.
 }}
 {{Case study subcatchment}}
 {{Site
@@ Line 57: / Line 69: @@
 {{Monitoring documents}}
 {{Monitoring documents end}}
 {{Additional Documents}}
 {{Additional Documents end}}
@@ Line 72: / Line 74: @@
 {{Additional links and references footer}}
 {{Supplementary Information}}

Kasvio at 09:25, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T09:25:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 25 April 2013
Line 59:		Line 59:
	{{Image gallery}}		{{Image gallery}}
	{{Case study image		{{Case study image
	\|File name=Ilabekken 1896.gif		\|File name=Ilabekken 1896, Hanskemakergata.gif
	\|Caption=Ilabekken year 1896 (photo from Morten Bergan)		\|Caption=Ilabekken year 1896 (photo from Morten Bergan)
	}}		}}
	{{Case study image		{{Case study image
	\|File name=Ilabekken 1956.gif		\|File name=Ilabekken 1956, Hanskemakergata.gif
	\|Caption=Ilabekken year 1956 (photo from Morten Bergan)		\|Caption=Ilabekken year 1956 (photo from Morten Bergan)
	}}		}}

Kasvio at 09:25, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T09:25:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 25 April 2013
Line 16:		Line 16:
	\|Partner organisations=Municipality of Trondheim and The Norwegian Public Roads Administration		\|Partner organisations=Municipality of Trondheim and The Norwegian Public Roads Administration
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
	\|Project picture=Illabekken morten2012.gif		\|Project picture=Illabekken morten2012, Hanskemakergata.gif
	\|Picture description=Ilabekken after restoration 2012 (photo by Morten Bergan)		\|Picture description=Ilabekken after restoration 2012 (photo by Morten Bergan)
	\|Project summary=The Ilabekken brook is a small watercourse in the City of Trondheim. Since the early 20th century the area of the brook has urbanized. Because of the urbanization and loading from the sewage waters there has been loss of habitats and natural biodiversity in the brook. The sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) population had disappeared, in addition to other aquatic organisms and birds.		\|Project summary=The Ilabekken brook is a small watercourse in the City of Trondheim. Since the early 20th century the area of the brook has urbanized. Because of the urbanization and loading from the sewage waters there has been loss of habitats and natural biodiversity in the brook. The sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) population had disappeared, in addition to other aquatic organisms and birds.

Kasvio at 09:16, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T09:16:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:16, 25 April 2013
Line 17:		Line 17:
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
	\|Project picture=Illabekken morten2012.gif		\|Project picture=Illabekken morten2012.gif
	\|Picture description=~~Illabekken~~ after restoration 2012 (photo by Morten Bergan)		\|Picture description=Ilabekken after restoration 2012 (photo by Morten Bergan)
	\|Project summary=The Ilabekken brook is a small watercourse in the City of Trondheim. Since the early 20th century the area of the brook has urbanized. Because of the urbanization and loading from the sewage waters there has been loss of habitats and natural biodiversity in the brook. The sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) population had disappeared, in addition to other aquatic organisms and birds.		\|Project summary=The Ilabekken brook is a small watercourse in the City of Trondheim. Since the early 20th century the area of the brook has urbanized. Because of the urbanization and loading from the sewage waters there has been loss of habitats and natural biodiversity in the brook. The sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) population had disappeared, in addition to other aquatic organisms and birds.

Kasvio at 09:16, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T09:16:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:16, 25 April 2013
Line 58:		Line 58:
	{{Monitoring documents end}}		{{Monitoring documents end}}
	{{Image gallery}}		{{Image gallery}}
			{{Case study image
			\|File name=Ilabekken 1896.gif
			\|Caption=Ilabekken year 1896 (photo from Morten Bergan)
			}}
			{{Case study image
			\|File name=Ilabekken 1956.gif
			\|Caption=Ilabekken year 1956 (photo from Morten Bergan)
			}}
	{{Image gallery end}}		{{Image gallery end}}
	{{Additional Documents}}		{{Additional Documents}}

Kasvio at 08:24, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T08:24:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 25 April 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	{{Project overview		{{Project overview
	\|Status=Complete		\|Status=Complete
	\|Themes=Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity		\|Themes=Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring
	\|Country=Norway		\|Country=Norway
	\|Main contact forename=-		\|Main contact forename=Morten
	\|Main contact surname=-		\|Main contact surname=Bergan
	\|Contact organisation=Municipality of Trondheim and The Norwegian Public Roads Administration		\|Main contact id=Arolam
			\|Contact organisation=Niva
			\|Contact organisation url=http://www.niva.org/home/
			\|Partner organisations=Municipality of Trondheim and The Norwegian Public Roads Administration
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
	\|Project picture=Illabekken morten2012.gif		\|Project picture=Illabekken morten2012.gif
Line 21:		Line 24:
	The aim of the restoration was to improve the whole Ila valley area for recreation and well-being. The object was to reopen the Ilabekken brook and to stop the loading from sewage waters. Also habitat adaptations were made to recover the biodiversity in the brook for example creating more spawning and living places for sea trout and aquatic organisms by adding stones and gravel in the stream.		The aim of the restoration was to improve the whole Ila valley area for recreation and well-being. The object was to reopen the Ilabekken brook and to stop the loading from sewage waters. Also habitat adaptations were made to recover the biodiversity in the brook for example creating more spawning and living places for sea trout and aquatic organisms by adding stones and gravel in the stream.

	After the restoration the area of the Ilabekken brook has been a popular respite site in the city. The content of phosphorous and other pollutants have decreased in to the natural levels and populations of pollution sensitive species has recovered. Salmonid fish has rehabitated the brook and right after the restoration spawning and reproduction of trout has been also successful. The restoration of Ilabekken brook ~~was~~ a good example of good co-operation between different stakeholders. There were open and broad channels of communication with the local population and other actors throughout the planning process.		After the restoration the area of the Ilabekken brook has been a popular respite site in the city. The content of phosphorous and other pollutants have decreased in to the natural levels and populations of pollution sensitive species has recovered. Salmonid fish has rehabitated the brook and right after the restoration spawning and reproduction of trout has been also successful. Also macroinvertebrate communities have been re-established after the restorations. Monitoring studies performed by NIVA from the last 5 years have showned rapid recolonization from upstream during the first year. And maintaining this biodiversity will reflect to more pristine streches upstream. This is in accordance with the enhanced water quality, more steady water level (during winter) and habitat improvement measures that have been taken during the restoration project.
			The restoration of Ilabekken brook has been a good example of good co-operation between different stakeholders. There were open and broad channels of communication with the local population and other actors throughout the planning process.
	}}		}}
	{{Case study subcatchment}}		{{Case study subcatchment}}

Kasvio at 08:11, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T08:11:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:11, 25 April 2013
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|Contact organisation=Municipality of Trondheim and The Norwegian Public Roads Administration		\|Contact organisation=Municipality of Trondheim and The Norwegian Public Roads Administration
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
			\|Project picture=Illabekken morten2012.gif
			\|Picture description=Illabekken after restoration 2012 (photo by Morten Bergan)
	\|Project summary=The Ilabekken brook is a small watercourse in the City of Trondheim. Since the early 20th century the area of the brook has urbanized. Because of the urbanization and loading from the sewage waters there has been loss of habitats and natural biodiversity in the brook. The sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) population had disappeared, in addition to other aquatic organisms and birds.		\|Project summary=The Ilabekken brook is a small watercourse in the City of Trondheim. Since the early 20th century the area of the brook has urbanized. Because of the urbanization and loading from the sewage waters there has been loss of habitats and natural biodiversity in the brook. The sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) population had disappeared, in addition to other aquatic organisms and birds.

Line 20:		Line 22:

	After the restoration the area of the Ilabekken brook has been a popular respite site in the city. The content of phosphorous and other pollutants have decreased in to the natural levels and populations of pollution sensitive species has recovered. Salmonid fish has rehabitated the brook and right after the restoration spawning and reproduction of trout has been also successful. The restoration of Ilabekken brook was a good example of good co-operation between different stakeholders. There were open and broad channels of communication with the local population and other actors throughout the planning process.		After the restoration the area of the Ilabekken brook has been a popular respite site in the city. The content of phosphorous and other pollutants have decreased in to the natural levels and populations of pollution sensitive species has recovered. Salmonid fish has rehabitated the brook and right after the restoration spawning and reproduction of trout has been also successful. The restoration of Ilabekken brook was a good example of good co-operation between different stakeholders. There were open and broad channels of communication with the local population and other actors throughout the planning process.

	}}		}}
	{{Case study subcatchment}}		{{Case study subcatchment}}