Case study:Massadammen-dam removal in River Tabergsån - Revision history

Kasvio: Reverted edits by JoshRRC (talk) to last revision by Admin

2015-02-03T13:02:29Z

Reverted edits by JoshRRC (talk) to last revision by Admin

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 3 February 2015
Line 60:		Line 60:
	\|Biological quality elements=Fish,		\|Biological quality elements=Fish,
	}}		}}
	{{Measures		{{Measures}}
	~~\|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank re-grading,~~
	~~\|Floodplain / River corridor=fish passage installed,~~
	~~\|Planform / Channel pattern=Removal of a weir,~~
	}}
	{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}		{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
	{{End table}}		{{End table}}

JoshRRC at 15:55, 15 September 2014

2014-09-15T15:55:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:55, 15 September 2014
Line 60:		Line 60:
	\|Biological quality elements=Fish,		\|Biological quality elements=Fish,
	}}		}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures
			\|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank re-grading,
			\|Floodplain / River corridor=fish passage installed,
			\|Planform / Channel pattern=Removal of a weir,
			}}
	{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}		{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
	{{End table}}		{{End table}}

Admin at 06:37, 6 September 2013

2013-09-06T06:37:07Z

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Most of the work was done between early august to late october in 2011. Because of the restoration spawning area for fish increased from 29 000 to 36 000 m2. Also densities of trout increased in the upstream. Densities were measured to be 5 times higher after than before restorations. Total cost of the project was approximately 174 000 euros.
 }}
 {{Case study subcatchment}}
 {{Site
@@ Line 55: / Line 71: @@
 {{Monitoring documents}}
 {{Monitoring documents end}}
 {{Additional Documents}}
 {{Additional Documents end}}
@@ Line 74: / Line 76: @@
 {{Additional links and references footer}}
 {{Supplementary Information}}

Kasvio at 12:07, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T12:07:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:07, 25 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Case study status		{{Case study status
	\|Approval status=~~Draft~~		\|Approval status=Approved
	}}		}}
	{{Location		{{Location

Laamaneno at 12:49, 13 December 2012

2012-12-13T12:49:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:49, 13 December 2012
Line 58:		Line 58:
	{{Case study image		{{Case study image
	\|File name=After restoration (photo. Maria Arola).JPG		\|File name=After restoration (photo. Maria Arola).JPG
			\|Caption=Restored channel (photo. Maria Arola)
	}}		}}
	{{Case study image		{{Case study image
	\|File name=Dam (photo. Maria Arola).JPG		\|File name=Dam (photo. Maria Arola).JPG
			\|Caption=Removed dam (photo. Maria Arola)
	}}		}}
	{{Case study image		{{Case study image
	\|File name=Gra(photo. Maria Arola).JPG		\|File name=Gra(photo. Maria Arola).JPG
			\|Caption=Added gravel (photo. Maria Arola)
	}}		}}
	{{Image gallery end}}		{{Image gallery end}}

Laamaneno at 11:34, 13 December 2012

2012-12-13T11:34:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:34, 13 December 2012
Line 56:		Line 56:
	{{Monitoring documents end}}		{{Monitoring documents end}}
	{{Image gallery}}		{{Image gallery}}
			{{Case study image
			\|File name=After restoration (photo. Maria Arola).JPG
			}}
			{{Case study image
			\|File name=Dam (photo. Maria Arola).JPG
			}}
			{{Case study image
			\|File name=Gra(photo. Maria Arola).JPG
			}}
	{{Image gallery end}}		{{Image gallery end}}
	{{Additional Documents}}		{{Additional Documents}}

Laamaneno at 11:28, 13 December 2012

2012-12-13T11:28:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 13 December 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
	\|Project picture=Massadammen-dam removal (photo. Maria Arola).JPG		\|Project picture=Massadammen-dam removal (photo. Maria Arola).JPG
	\|Picture description=After restoration		\|Picture description=After restoration (photo. Maria Arola)
	\|Project summary=Massadammen dam in the South of Jönköping in the River Tabergsån. The dam was built in 1906 for hydropower but the hydro power station was shut down in 1950´s. Because the dam was an obsticle for migrating fish it was decided to remove to improve the conditions for fish. The aim was to build fishpassage, increase the spawning areas for trout and to reduce the regulation and maintenance of the dam. The first plan of the restoration met heavy resistace from the local people because they wanted to maintain the water level. The new plan was made and three dams were built instead of one in the dammed area. The project was good example of the co-operation between different organization (municipality, consultants and local people) to find a goos solution for all parties.		\|Project summary=Massadammen dam in the South of Jönköping in the River Tabergsån. The dam was built in 1906 for hydropower but the hydro power station was shut down in 1950´s. Because the dam was an obsticle for migrating fish it was decided to remove to improve the conditions for fish. The aim was to build fishpassage, increase the spawning areas for trout and to reduce the regulation and maintenance of the dam. The first plan of the restoration met heavy resistace from the local people because they wanted to maintain the water level. The new plan was made and three dams were built instead of one in the dammed area. The project was good example of the co-operation between different organization (municipality, consultants and local people) to find a goos solution for all parties.

Laamaneno at 11:27, 13 December 2012

2012-12-13T11:27:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:27, 13 December 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:
	\|Contact organisation url=projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/tabergsan/Pages/5-massadammen.aspx		\|Contact organisation url=projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/tabergsan/Pages/5-massadammen.aspx
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
			\|Project picture=Massadammen-dam removal (photo. Maria Arola).JPG
			\|Picture description=After restoration
	\|Project summary=Massadammen dam in the South of Jönköping in the River Tabergsån. The dam was built in 1906 for hydropower but the hydro power station was shut down in 1950´s. Because the dam was an obsticle for migrating fish it was decided to remove to improve the conditions for fish. The aim was to build fishpassage, increase the spawning areas for trout and to reduce the regulation and maintenance of the dam. The first plan of the restoration met heavy resistace from the local people because they wanted to maintain the water level. The new plan was made and three dams were built instead of one in the dammed area. The project was good example of the co-operation between different organization (municipality, consultants and local people) to find a goos solution for all parties.		\|Project summary=Massadammen dam in the South of Jönköping in the River Tabergsån. The dam was built in 1906 for hydropower but the hydro power station was shut down in 1950´s. Because the dam was an obsticle for migrating fish it was decided to remove to improve the conditions for fish. The aim was to build fishpassage, increase the spawning areas for trout and to reduce the regulation and maintenance of the dam. The first plan of the restoration met heavy resistace from the local people because they wanted to maintain the water level. The new plan was made and three dams were built instead of one in the dammed area. The project was good example of the co-operation between different organization (municipality, consultants and local people) to find a goos solution for all parties.

	Most of the work was done between early august to late october in 2011. Because of the restoration spawning area for fish increased from 29 000 to 36 000 m2. Also densities of trout increased in the upstream. Densities were measured to be 5 times higher after than before restorations. Total cost of the project was approximately 174 000 euros.		Most of the work was done between early august to late october in 2011. Because of the restoration spawning area for fish increased from 29 000 to 36 000 m2. Also densities of trout increased in the upstream. Densities were measured to be 5 times higher after than before restorations. Total cost of the project was approximately 174 000 euros.

	}}		}}
	{{Case study subcatchment}}		{{Case study subcatchment}}

Laamaneno at 10:42, 23 November 2012

2012-11-23T10:42:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:42, 23 November 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:
	\|Contact organisation url=projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/tabergsan/Pages/5-massadammen.aspx		\|Contact organisation url=projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/tabergsan/Pages/5-massadammen.aspx
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
	\|Project summary=Massadammen dam in the South of Jönköping in the River Tabergsån. The dam was built in 1906 for hydropower but the hydro power station was shut down in 1950´s. Because the dam was an obsticle for migrating fish it was decided to remove to improve the conditions for fish. The aim was to build fishpassage, increase the spawning areas for trout and to reduce the regulation and maintenance of the dam.		\|Project summary=Massadammen dam in the South of Jönköping in the River Tabergsån. The dam was built in 1906 for hydropower but the hydro power station was shut down in 1950´s. Because the dam was an obsticle for migrating fish it was decided to remove to improve the conditions for fish. The aim was to build fishpassage, increase the spawning areas for trout and to reduce the regulation and maintenance of the dam. The first plan of the restoration met heavy resistace from the local people because they wanted to maintain the water level. The new plan was made and three dams were built instead of one in the dammed area. The project was good example of the co-operation between different organization (municipality, consultants and local people) to find a goos solution for all parties.


			Most of the work was done between early august to late october in 2011. Because of the restoration spawning area for fish increased from 29 000 to 36 000 m2. Also densities of trout increased in the upstream. Densities were measured to be 5 times higher after than before restorations. Total cost of the project was approximately 174 000 euros.

	}}		}}
	{{Case study subcatchment}}		{{Case study subcatchment}}

Laamaneno at 10:26, 23 November 2012

2012-11-23T10:26:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:26, 23 November 2012
Line 37:		Line 37:
	\|Total1 cost=174		\|Total1 cost=174
	}}		}}
	{{Motivations}}		{{Motivations
			\|Specific mitigation=Barriers to fish migration, Hydropower,
			\|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms,
			\|Biological quality elements=Fish,
			}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures}}
	{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}		{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}