Case study:Fish pass on the Najerilla River - Revision history

Joeri1992 at 14:12, 24 July 2018

2018-07-24T14:12:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 24 July 2018
Line 89:		Line 89:
	\|Other motivation=It generates a profit in the agricultural communities of the zone.		\|Other motivation=It generates a profit in the agricultural communities of the zone.
	}}		}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures
			\|Bank and bed modifications measure=Creation of fish passes,
			}}
	{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}		{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
	{{End table}}		{{End table}}

2018-06-26T09:05:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 26 June 2018
Line 83:		Line 83:
	\|Funding sources=Part of this work was supported through FEADER funding (European funding to improve the rural development).		\|Funding sources=Part of this work was supported through FEADER funding (European funding to improve the rural development).
	}}		}}
	{{Motivations}}		{{Motivations
			\|Specific mitigation=Barriers to fish migration,
			\|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms,
			\|Biological quality elements=Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition,
			\|Other motivation=It generates a profit in the agricultural communities of the zone.
			}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures}}
	{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}		{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}

2018-06-26T09:01:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:01, 26 June 2018
Line 98:		Line 98:
	{{Additional Documents end}}		{{Additional Documents end}}
	{{Additional links and references header}}		{{Additional links and references header}}
			{{Additional links and references
			\|Link=europe.wetlands.org/publications/river-fragmentation-analysis-spain/
			\|Description=A link on the Wetlands International website to a document that describes the project.
			}}
			{{Additional links and references
			\|Link=http://www.ecohidraulica.com/
			\|Description=All information on this page is copied from the document mentioned above which is written by Ecohidráulica, S.L.
			}}
	{{Additional links and references footer}}		{{Additional links and references footer}}
	{{Supplementary Information		{{Supplementary Information

2018-06-26T08:59:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:59, 26 June 2018
Line 62:		Line 62:
	}}		}}
	{{Image gallery}}		{{Image gallery}}
			{{Case study image
			\|File name=Rock ramps Najerilla.png
			\|Caption=Rock ramp in the Najerilla River with a low flow (left) and with a higher flow (right). Photo credits: Pedro Boné.
			}}
	{{Image gallery end}}		{{Image gallery end}}
	{{Toggle button}}		{{Toggle button}}

2018-06-26T08:58:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:58, 26 June 2018
Line 66:		Line 66:
	{{Toggle content start}}		{{Toggle content start}}
	{{Case study subcatchment}}		{{Case study subcatchment}}
	{{Site}}		{{Site
			\|Heavily modified water body=No
			\|Protected species present=No
			\|Invasive species present=No
			\|Species=Brown trout (Salmo trutta), Luciobarbus graellsii, Barbus meridionalis, Parachondrostoma miegii, Gobio lozanoi
			\|Mean discharge category=10 - 100 m³/s
			\|Mn discharge=16.5
			}}
	{{Project background		{{Project background
	\|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€		\|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€

2018-06-26T08:56:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 26 June 2018
Line 67:		Line 67:
	{{Case study subcatchment}}		{{Case study subcatchment}}
	{{Site}}		{{Site}}
	{{Project background}}		{{Project background
			\|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€
			\|Total1 cost=61.8
			\|Funding sources=Part of this work was supported through FEADER funding (European funding to improve the rural development).
			}}
	{{Motivations}}		{{Motivations}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures}}

2018-06-26T08:55:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:55, 26 June 2018
Line 50:		Line 50:
	gravels have been embedded in the surface of the ramp in order to increase the		gravels have been embedded in the surface of the ramp in order to increase the
	roughness of the ramp bottom. The slope of the ramp was 5%		roughness of the ramp bottom. The slope of the ramp was 5%
	\|~~Lessons learn~~=The implementation		\|Monitoring surveys and results=The implementation
	of monitoring		of monitoring
	programs is essential		programs is essential

2018-06-26T08:54:49Z

@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 {{Additional links and references header}}
 {{Additional links and references footer}}
-{{Supplementary Information}}
+{{Supplementary Information
 {{Toggle content end}}

2018-06-26T08:54:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:54, 26 June 2018
Line 59:		Line 59:
	of information about		of information about
	this action.		this action.

	~~It is advisable to use~~
	~~rock ramps,~~
	~~whenever the place~~
	~~permits, as they~~
	~~integrate in a more~~
	~~natural way with the~~
	~~environment.~~
	\|Project title=Fish pass on the Najerilla River		\|Project title=Fish pass on the Najerilla River
	}}		}}

2018-06-26T08:54:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:54, 26 June 2018
Line 59:		Line 59:
	of information about		of information about
	this action.		this action.

			It is advisable to use
			rock ramps,
			whenever the place
			permits, as they
			integrate in a more
			natural way with the
			environment.
	\|Project title=Fish pass on the Najerilla River		\|Project title=Fish pass on the Najerilla River
	}}		}}