Case study:Clayton Vale - Revision history

Hazel Wilson at 15:05, 23 October 2015

2015-10-23T15:05:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:05, 23 October 2015
Line 33:		Line 33:
	{{Site		{{Site
	\|WFD water body code=GB112069061152		\|WFD water body code=GB112069061152
			\|WFD water body name=River Medlock (Lumb Brook to Irwell)
	\|Heavily modified water body=No		\|Heavily modified water body=No
	\|Protected species present=No		\|Protected species present=No

JoshRRC at 09:05, 28 August 2015

2015-08-28T09:05:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 28 August 2015
Line 31:		Line 31:
	\|Subcatchment=River Medlock (Lumb Brook to Irwell)		\|Subcatchment=River Medlock (Lumb Brook to Irwell)
	}}		}}
	{{Site}}		{{Site
			\|WFD water body code=GB112069061152
			\|Heavily modified water body=No
			\|Protected species present=No
			\|Invasive species present=No
			}}
	{{Project background}}		{{Project background}}
	{{Motivations		{{Motivations

NickRRC at 14:45, 13 May 2014

2014-05-13T14:45:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 13 May 2014
Line 37:		Line 37:
	\|Biological quality elements=Fish,		\|Biological quality elements=Fish,
	}}		}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures
			\|Bank and bed modifications measure=Weir removal,
			}}
	{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}		{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
	{{End table}}		{{End table}}

NickRRC at 14:44, 13 May 2014

2014-05-13T14:44:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 13 May 2014
Line 33:		Line 33:
	{{Site}}		{{Site}}
	{{Project background}}		{{Project background}}
	{{Motivations}}		{{Motivations
			\|Specific mitigation=Barriers to fish migration,
			\|Biological quality elements=Fish,
			}}
	{{Measures}}		{{Measures}}
	{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}		{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}

Ascarr at 13:53, 23 October 2013

2013-10-23T13:53:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 23 October 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	{{Project overview		{{Project overview
	\|Status=In progress		\|Status=In progress
	\|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology		\|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Urban
	\|Country=England		\|Country=England
	\|Main contact forename=Oliver		\|Main contact forename=Oliver
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\|Project summary=Manchester City Council identified that the Clayton Vale portion of the study area (east of Bank Bridge Road) was occupied by a historical landfill site, which was used for the disposal of ash cinders from the Stuart Street Power Station and as a municipal landfill. Consultants Atkins are in the process of undertaking ground investigations to determine leachate, groundwater and soil contamination including waste characterisation testing to determine the status of these materials and to allow an effective remediation strategy to be developed for the any river channel/corridor restoration works and to prevent the creation of new pollutant linkages or the exacerbation of existing ones, in upstream demonstration area.		\|Project summary=Manchester City Council identified that the Clayton Vale portion of the study area (east of Bank Bridge Road) was occupied by a historical landfill site, which was used for the disposal of ash cinders from the Stuart Street Power Station and as a municipal landfill. Consultants Atkins are in the process of undertaking ground investigations to determine leachate, groundwater and soil contamination including waste characterisation testing to determine the status of these materials and to allow an effective remediation strategy to be developed for the any river channel/corridor restoration works and to prevent the creation of new pollutant linkages or the exacerbation of existing ones, in upstream demonstration area.

	It will be a huge achievement if we can restore this most heavily degraded section of waterbody, but the aspiration is to create a safe riverine environment for all, reconnect and integrate the river corridor back with the adjoining greenspace and public parks, and restore the river so that it is capable of supporting diverse aquatic fauna once more.		It will be a huge achievement if we can restore this most heavily degraded section of waterbody, but the aspiration is to create a safe riverine environment for all, reconnect and integrate the river corridor back with the adjoining greenspace and public parks, and restore the river so that it is capable of supporting diverse aquatic fauna once more.

	}}		}}
	{{Image gallery}}		{{Image gallery}}

Ascarr at 12:07, 4 October 2013

2013-10-04T12:07:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:07, 4 October 2013
Line 30:		Line 30:
	{{Toggle content start}}		{{Toggle content start}}
	{{Case study subcatchment		{{Case study subcatchment
	\|Subcatchment=River Medlock		\|Subcatchment=River Medlock (Lumb Brook to Irwell)
	}}		}}
	{{Site}}		{{Site}}

Admin at 08:40, 6 September 2013

2013-09-06T08:40:27Z

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 }}
 {{Case study subcatchment
 |Subcatchment=River Medlock
@@ Line 38: / Line 46: @@
 {{Monitoring documents}}
 {{Monitoring documents end}}
 {{Additional Documents}}
 {{Additional Documents end}}
@@ Line 49: / Line 51: @@
 {{Additional links and references footer}}
 {{Supplementary Information}}

NickRRC at 15:50, 5 September 2013

2013-09-05T15:50:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 5 September 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Case study status		{{Case study status
	\|Approval status=~~Draft~~		\|Approval status=Approved
	}}		}}
	{{Location		{{Location

Ascarr at 12:26, 8 June 2013

2013-06-08T12:26:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 8 June 2013
Line 39:		Line 39:
	{{Monitoring documents end}}		{{Monitoring documents end}}
	{{Image gallery}}		{{Image gallery}}
			{{Case study image
			\|File name=River Medlock weir Clayton Vale.png
			\|Caption=Weir prior to works
			}}
	{{Image gallery end}}		{{Image gallery end}}
	{{Additional Documents}}		{{Additional Documents}}

Ascarr at 12:09, 8 June 2013

2013-06-08T12:09:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 8 June 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	}}		}}
	{{Project overview		{{Project overview
	~~\|Project title=Clayton Vale~~
	\|Status=In progress		\|Status=In progress
	\|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology		\|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Line 13:		Line 12:
	\|Main contact surname=Southgate		\|Main contact surname=Southgate
	\|Contact organisation=Environment Agency		\|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
			\|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:River Irwell Restoration Project
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
	\|~~Name~~ of ~~parent multi-~~site ~~project=Case_study:River Irwell Restoration Project~~		\|Project picture=Weir removal clayton vale.png
			\|Picture description=weir removal within Clayton Vale
			\|Project summary=Manchester City Council identified that the Clayton Vale portion of the study area (east of Bank Bridge Road) was occupied by a historical landfill site, which was used for the disposal of ash cinders from the Stuart Street Power Station and as a municipal landfill. Consultants Atkins are in the process of undertaking ground investigations to determine leachate, groundwater and soil contamination including waste characterisation testing to determine the status of these materials and to allow an effective remediation strategy to be developed for the any river channel/corridor restoration works and to prevent the creation of new pollutant linkages or the exacerbation of existing ones, in upstream demonstration area.

			It will be a huge achievement if we can restore this most heavily degraded section of waterbody, but the aspiration is to create a safe riverine environment for all, reconnect and integrate the river corridor back with the adjoining greenspace and public parks, and restore the river so that it is capable of supporting diverse aquatic fauna once more.

	}}		}}
	{{Case study subcatchment		{{Case study subcatchment