Case study:Ashlone Wharf FCRM scheme - Revision history

Alexrrc at 12:53, 1 November 2018

2018-11-01T12:53:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 1 November 2018
Line 51:		Line 51:
	\|Reach length directly affected=100 m		\|Reach length directly affected=100 m
	\|Project started=2011/05/01		\|Project started=2011/05/01
	\|Funding sources=Environment Agency: Flood and ~~coastal risk management~~		\|Funding sources=Environment Agency Flood and Coastal Risk Management,
	}}		}}
	{{Motivations		{{Motivations

2017-06-02T09:14:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 2 June 2017
Line 57:		Line 57:
	}}		}}
	{{Measures		{{Measures
	\|Other technical measure=~~Installation~~ of a fish ~~pass~~		\|Other technical measure=Creation of fish passes,
	}}		}}
	{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}		{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}

2016-10-20T08:49:52Z

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 }}
 {{Measures
-|Bank and bed modifications measure=
+|Other technical measure=Installation of a fish pass
 }}
 {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}

2016-10-20T08:48:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 20 October 2016
Line 32:		Line 32:

	At the lower section of Beverley Brook the flow is diverted into a series of culvert which outfall into the Thames and only 20% of the flow continues down the main channel. As a result the flows are low and there is a lot of siltation and lack of inchannel processes. Drivers: Biodiversity Action Plan, Water Framework Directive.		At the lower section of Beverley Brook the flow is diverted into a series of culvert which outfall into the Thames and only 20% of the flow continues down the main channel. As a result the flows are low and there is a lot of siltation and lack of inchannel processes. Drivers: Biodiversity Action Plan, Water Framework Directive.
			\|Lessons learn=Improvement of structural operability enables review of operation regimes to minimise the requirement for further improvement works. Whilst replacement of existing structures is not a sustainable measure, the operating regime that follows increases the long term condition of the river and structure.
	}}		}}
	{{Image_gallery}}		{{Image_gallery}}

2016-10-20T08:44:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 20 October 2016
Line 20:		Line 20:
	\|Contact organisation=Environment Agency		\|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
	\|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency		\|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
			\|Partner organisations=London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham
	\|Multi-site=No		\|Multi-site=No
	\|Project summary=Planned objectives:<br>		\|Project summary=Planned objectives:<br>

2016-10-20T08:43:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:43, 20 October 2016
Line 48:		Line 48:
	{{Project background		{{Project background
	\|Reach length directly affected=100 m		\|Reach length directly affected=100 m
	\|Project started=2011/01/01		\|Project started=2011/05/01
	\|Funding sources=Environment Agency: Flood and coastal risk management		\|Funding sources=Environment Agency: Flood and coastal risk management
	}}		}}

2016-10-20T08:42:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:42, 20 October 2016
Line 52:		Line 52:
	}}		}}
	{{Motivations		{{Motivations
	~~\|Hydromorphological quality elements=~~		\|Biological quality elements=Modify structures to improve fish passage



	\|Biological quality elements=

	~~\|Physico-chemical quality elements=~~

	~~\|Specific mitigation=~~

	~~\|Other motivation=~~

	}}		}}
	{{Measures		{{Measures

2015-10-27T09:50:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 27 October 2015
Line 41:		Line 41:
	{{Site		{{Site
	\|WFD water body code=GB106039022850		\|WFD water body code=GB106039022850
			\|WFD water body name=Beverley Brook (Motspur Park to Thames) and Pyl Brook at West Barnes
	\|Heavily modified water body=No		\|Heavily modified water body=No
	\|Protected species present=No		\|Protected species present=No

2015-09-02T10:40:08Z

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 }}
 {{Site
-|Name=
+|WFD water body code=GB106039022850
+|Heavily modified water body=No
+|Protected species present=No
+|Invasive species present=No
 }}
 {{Project background

2014-04-07T08:49:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 7 April 2014
Line 27:		Line 27:
	• Potential to undertake habitat creation or enhancement works.<br>		• Potential to undertake habitat creation or enhancement works.<br>

	Objectives carried out (2012):		Objectives carried out (2012):<br>
	Flood and coastal risk management scheme to repair tidal sluice incorporating fish pass and reedbed.		Flood and coastal risk management scheme to repair tidal sluice incorporating fish pass and reedbed.